Monday, September 1, 2014

Bolt's Grip On Reality Is Tenuous. His Grip On History Is Even Worse. | newmatilda.com

Bolt's Grip On Reality Is Tenuous. His Grip On History Is Even Worse. | newmatilda.com

Bolt's Grip On Reality Is Tenuous. His Grip On History Is Even Worse.



By Amy McQuire





What
do you get when you take another stupid Tony Abbott quote and embellish
it with a bit of Andrew Bolt spin? Amy McQuire takes a stab.




If
you’d like a side of stupidity to accompany your Sunday morning
scrambled eggs, Channel Ten has been serving up the Bolt Report for over
a year now.



The show features a monotone Andrew Bolt presenting his racist,
inaccurate and self-serving propaganda to those who may not already have
ingested the weekly bile spewed in his Herald Sun columns.



Last week, Prime Minister Tony Abbott, Bolt’s closest threat to the
“Most Offensive Person in Australia” title, briefly overtook the shock
jock in the stakes when he said the most defining moment in the
country’s history was the arrival of the first fleet.



He was so sure of this “fact”, he said it twice.


It was obviously an outrage. The settlement of Australia heralded the
demolition of a 70,000-year-old culture (although it survives despite
attempts from assimilationist governments) and the deaths of tens of
thousands of Aboriginal people at the hands of the colonialists.



I’m not just talking about a few deaths. I’m talking about deaths on a
genocidal scale. There are estimates that 60,000 First Nations people
were killed in Queensland alone.



There are massacre sites scattered throughout this land, trampled by bushwalkers or destroyed by development. 


The common history taught at school was that my people did not
resist, that they did not fight for the land that sustained them for
thousands and thousands of years, and which they in turn cared for
meticulously (read Bill Gammage’s The Greatest Estate on Earth).



That is one of the great lies of Australia’s history. But a history
of black resistance is not considered a “defining moment” for Abbott,
Bolt and their ilk.  The Frontier Wars were effectively wiped from the
history books and are absent from our national memory.



Yesterday, Andrew Bolt addressed the issue on his show, claiming his
rightful place on the “most offensive” throne, with guests Nikki Savva, a
former Liberal party staffer, and Health Services Union manager
Kimberley Kitching.



Bolt played an excerpt of Abbott’s speech and followed it up with
this pearl of wisdom: “I think the fact he repeated it, suggested he
really wanted people to hear it and react to it”.



Kitching timidly replied: “Yes but I think it’s better when a Prime
Minister is inclusive, and I’m not sure that the first fleet arriving in
boats full of convicts, really defines Australia today.”



Bolt scoffed at her.


“And what language are you speaking Kimberley?” he asked.


“English”


“Wow…” Bolt replied. “How could you… but this is the point. The ABC
was full of predictable outrage yesterday from Aboriginal leaders,
including Abbott’s own advisor Warren Mundine who seems to be operating
as a one-man opposition within the government… the fact is you should be
able to say the truth. It was the most defining moment in our history.”



Savva responded with her own version of Bolt’s argument:


“It was a statement of the bleeding obvious… and it might not be a
happy statement of the bleeding obvious for Indigenous people, but the
fact is that is what happened. That is why Australia is what it is today
– now Indigenous people may wish it wasn’t so… but it is so.



“We are here, we are speaking English, we have a judicial system
gained from the British, we have a parliamentary system gained from the
British.”



Bolt interjected: “The rule of law”.



“The rule of law… all these things,” Savva said.


And then Bolt dropped the clanger: “And a lot of these are actually
good. I found it amazing. Aboriginal leaders responding in English to
this statement of the bleeding obvious… it sort of just plays into
Abbott’s hands.”



Bolt is gleefully boasting about the political capital Abbott could
have gained from the pain of Aboriginal people not being able to speak
their traditional languages.



It really is a ‘statement of the bleeding obvious’: The reason
Aboriginal people respond in English is because languages were ripped
from their tongues by successive governments that aimed to either wipe
away or assimilate Aboriginal cultures into mainstream Australia.



The history of the settlement of Australia described by Bolt and
Savva is not “true” or “fact” – it is a whitewashed history that
excludes the traumatic experiences of Aboriginal people and boasts about
the barriers that push against them when they try to exercise their
rights to culture, language and spirituality.



Australia is one of the world’s top hot spots for disappearing
languages, which should be a shock to all citizens because languages are
the portal to revitalising and reinvigorating cultural practices.



Languages are libraries of cultural knowledge. To Aboriginal people,
they are as valuable as the commodities the big miners want to rip from
our land.



For Bolt to undermine this, and instead react in amusement to the
continual suppression of Indigenous languages and cultural practices, is
one of the most offensive things I’ve heard from him. And I’ve heard
him utter some pretty offensive things.



This lie that all Australians have benefited from systems gained from
the British is also one that doesn’t weigh up with the evidence.



How then would you explain the fact the nation’s jails are brimming
with Aboriginal men, women and children, on the losing end of a white
justice system? Or ‘the rule of law’ as Bolt puts it.



This is not a happy statement of “the bleeding obvious” for Bolt or
Savva. It is a stupid, and inaccurate statement that does nothing to
help raise Aboriginal equality.







No comments:

Post a Comment