Rundle: Abbott visits Iraq, desperately seeking a coherent message
Team Abbott’s surprise visit to Iraq was, to put it mildly, a
little curious. To put it less mildly, the move smacks of a government
desperate to find a meaningful project after a year of failures.
For a secret visit, Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s
Christmas/New Year drop-in on Iraq sure does have a lot of
well-organised publicity surrounding it. The entirely unnecessary visit
had all the usual palaver — reviewing the ridiculously clad troops, and
holding a press conference with a harassed Iraqi
businessman-turned-politician, in the sort of chairs that suggest a
buying expedition down Sydney Road, Brunswick is underway.
Abbott announced an extra $5 million in military aid for the
Iraqis. To call such a sum “chicken-feed” is an insult to
kibble — there wouldn’t be much change out of a million or so for the
visit itself. But it permits Abbott to hit the ground running in 2015
with a renewed attempt to put the battle against ISIS/ISIL/Islamic State
at the centre of an attempt to regain legitimacy and authority at home.
The desperation of this strategy is obvious. Since their
initial upsurge, and their media-savvy mass executions, IS has already
started to fade from the global consciousness. Now contained within an
area of territory centred on the Iraq-Syria border, clear limits have
been placed on their expansion. That doesn’t mean they’re no longer a
threat, since reports suggest that US bombing has helped them gain
recruits. Nor is there any guarantee that the Syria/Iraq zone will be
the focus for the next radical Islamist break-out — something far more
likely to occur in northern Africa this year.
But IS functions as a useful foil at a time when almost all
antagonistic meaning has been leached out of the conflict. Islamic State
is happy to play up to the “barbaric” image that Western powers wish to
present themselves as the opposite of. Three or four years ago, when we
were lined up against President Bashar al-Assad in Syria, a
representative of Russian interests, “barbarism” consisted of using
chemical weapons (i.e. high-tech means to accomplish violent ends).
Now that we are in a de facto alliance with Assad against
IS, it is the particularly low-tech and medievalist methods of IS that
mark off true horror — and allow Tony Abbott to give yet another speech
about the challenge they represent to all that is good and right etc.
Meanwhile, in Syria, the wholesale killing goes on, neighbourhood by
neighbourhood, a volume of death IS could only dream of, but now absent
from the front pages.
That the eruption of IS has changed the nature of the Middle
East and set it on a new trajectory is unquestioned. The claim they
represent a major threat to us is absurd. Abbott and co. have been
assisted in putting IS front and centre by the Lindt cafe siege, of
course, and News Corp has devoted all its energies to enforcing a
simplistic view of this event (and getting very shirty when anyone dares
to question it).
But the Lindt cafe siege can’t bear too much weight. For all
but members of the addled commentariat who append their opinions to
such articles, it’s obvious that Man Haron Monis’ desperate and
egotistical act was hardly a work of smooth and focused propaganda.
Rather than being austere and one-sided violence (a la the London 7/7
attacks) Monis’ attack was provoked by a failed case before the
Australian High Court. Having sought recognition from the Australian
state, he then got it from the tabloid media, who were happy to do his
propaganda for him.
The inevitable effect of trying to turn such a messy and
futile act into a meaningful one is to paint one’s own culture as
hopelessly weak and vulnerable, while at the same time braying endlessly
about how superior it is. Push that act too hard, and people simply
stop listening to you. Team Abbott probably knows that, but they have
nothing else. The pre-Christmas reshuffle appears designed to limit the
opportunities for Abbott’s leadership rivals, with the inevitable effect
of weakening rather than strengthening the government.
Still, an open-ended national security emergency will keep
the show (sort of) on the road, for a few months, forcing Opposition
Leader Bill Shorten to say “we support the government” over and over,
until someone cracks. It will be good news for the media monitors
too — with the Abbott government spending half a million dollars on
media services in one three month period. So they can know how that five
million bucks donated to contest the global terrorist menace is going,
presumably. It’s going to be a hell of a year.
No comments:
Post a Comment